On-Campus Strategies (Evidence-based)

This section of the Guide describes evidence-based policies and interventions that can be implemented on campus based on abundant evidence of effectiveness as reported in the literature.

INVISIBLE - DO NOT DELETE

Strategy: Prohibit Alcohol Use on Campus

Theory Behind the Strategy

College administrators can choose to have “dry” campuses, i.e., prohibiting the use of alcohol anywhere on campus, regardless of age. This strategy decreases alcohol availability, which can subsequently reduce alcohol use and related problems among college students.175,176

Evidence of Effectiveness

Wechsler et al.177 compared “dry” four-year schools with four-year schools that allowed alcohol use. This study found that students had lower rates of alcohol use and less heavy episodic drinking (i.e., five or more drinks for men and four or more drinks for women, per occasion, during the two weeks prior to the survey) at schools that prohibited the use of alcohol on campus compared with schools that allowed alcohol use. Students were also 30% less likely to be heavy episodic drinkers and 80% more likely to be abstainers at schools that prohibited alcohol use.

Also, students at “dry” schools reported experiencing fewer adverse secondhand effects of drinking, such as being assaulted, having their property damaged, or experiencing unwanted sexual advances.177 Similarly, another study found that a “dry” campus was associated with a reduction in drinking, particularly among females.178

However, campus-wide bans might not solve the problem of students coming to school with existing heavy drinking problems. While fewer students drank, if students drank at the “dry” schools, they still engaged in excessive drinking and experienced alcohol-related problems at rates similar to drinkers at non-“dry” schools.177 Generally, schools had more success reducing moderate drinking than heavy drinking through use of a campus-wide ban on alcohol use.177

Tips for Implementation

One of the great lessons of national Prohibition in the U.S. is that alcohol policies cannot go too far beyond what the population is willing to support. College administrators wishing to implement a campus-wide ban will need to form partnerships with student health center staff, student affairs staff, student organizations, law enforcement, alumni organizations, faculty, and staff—in short, the many diverse constituencies that make up a campus community—and generate broad, community-wide agreement if the ban is to be effectively implemented and enforced.

Strategy: Restrict Alcohol Consumption at Specific Places or Events

Theory Behind the Strategy

Alcohol use can be banned in specific places or events on campus to reduce the physical availability of alcohol. This strategy is a viable alternative for college administrators who do not want to prohibit alcohol entirely on campus.

Evidence of Effectiveness

This strategy has often been implemented in the form of alcohol- or substance-free residence halls. Alcohol-free residence halls can be established with a policy that bans the use of alcohol within residence halls or at residence hall events. Evidence suggests that residences that are only alcohol-free might not be effective in reducing alcohol use; however, substance-free residences are more promising. One study found that past 30-day alcohol use among students living in alcohol-free residences was not significantly different than among students in residences without restrictions.178 Another study found that students in alcohol-free housing were just as likely to drink heavily (e.g., consume five or more drinks per occasion for males, or four or more drinks per occasion for females) and experience alcohol-related problems compared with students in unrestricted housing on the same campus.179

In contrast, students living in substance-free housing were less likely to drink heavily or experience alcohol-related problems compared with those in unrestricted or alcohol-free housing.179 Underage college students living in either substance-free residences or off-campus with their parents were less likely to binge drink compared with those in unrestricted housing.180 Substance-free housing might also prevent students from becoming heavy drinkers. 179

Tips for Implementation

Findings from a large national survey suggest that more than 80% of the general public support restrictions of alcohol use in specific places or events181 and college administrators have a critical role in implementing such restrictions. Substance-free housing appears to be a popular option; the majority of schools do offer substance-free housing.179 Administrators should work to form partnerships with local public interest groups, campus and city police departments, student health center staff, and student affairs staff to gain support for this approach. Greater enforcement of established drinking rules makes a difference; it is associated with a decrease in alcohol-related violations.182 Enforcement, in turn, is much easier if residences are substance-free.

screenshot-2016-11-04-09-53-09

Strategy: Ban Alcohol Sales at Specific Places or Events

Theory Behind the Strategy

The sale of alcohol can be banned at specific places or events on campus as a means to reduce the physical availability of alcohol. College administrators might choose to implement these bans instead of banning alcohol sales campus-wide. Schools commonly ban sales of alcohol at sporting events8 but sales can also be prohibited at on-campus social events, such as concerts and festivals.

Evidence of Effectiveness

At the University of Colorado in Boulder, the administration restricted the sale of beer in the stadium and banned alcohol use in the stadium starting in the fall of 1996 as a two-year moratorium.184 A subsequent evaluation by the university found that numbers of ejections from the stadium, assaults, arrests, and referrals of students to the university’s judicial affairs process all dropped substantially compared with the year prior to the ban. The chancellor of the University of Colorado made the ban permanent following the success of the moratorium. There was not a significant reduction in the number of spectators following the ban on alcohol sales and use. Administrators worked closely with the police department to enforce the ban.184

Beyond the evidence cited here for residence halls and sporting events, there is little evidence available on the effects of banning alcohol sales or use at specific places or events on campus.

screenshot-2016-11-04-09-58-57

Share This